This article from The Daily Signal is a little frightening.  It makes me think about our tax code, like we have talked about in previous newsletters.  It seems that administration officials are trying to justify their jobs by putting more regulations and laws on the books.  How about doing just the opposite?  Get out of the way and help us prosper instead of always being a roadblock.

How are we supposed to keep track of all these rules?

How are we supposed to keep track of all these rules?

Talking to my friend the other day who owns a construction company, I asked him what his biggest challenge was with his business.  He said it’s remembering all the different municipalities he has to deal with.  Every organization has quirky little regulations and laws, and somehow he is supposed to know them all.  This is just not possible, but more importantly, it is just not necessary.

Apparently it’s not just the liberals that over-regulate, even though we know they always favor more government over less.  Always have and always will.  However, the conservatives have their dirty fingerprints on adding plenty of regulations as well.  Let’s put some Libertarians in charge!  Would they make the excessive regulations go away?

The following article is written by James Gattuso and Diane Katz

The consequences of this rampant rulemaking are widespread:

  • Restricted access to credit under the hundreds of rules unleashed by the Dodd–Frank financial regulation statute
  • Fewer health care choices and higher medical costs from the Affordable Care Act
  • Reduced internet investment and innovation under the network neutrality rules dictated by the Federal Communications Commission

These are just a few of the 2,353 regulations from 2015—and there have been 20,642 since Obama took office in 2009. 

The worst of last year’s wave—in terms of cost, at least—was the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Clean Power Plan.”

The rule represents the first direct regulation of so-called greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, at a cost of $7.2 billion a year (and far more according to critics). Despite the huge costs, the plan will do nothing to mitigate global warming.

America’s problem with excessive regulation did not start with the Obama administration, of course.

His predecessor George W. Bush was hardly a paragon of deregulation. Although Bush showed restraint during his first term, the number of regulations soared during his final years in office. Under the two administrations combined, their new rules added $176 billion in annual regulatory costs on Americans.

And there is much more to come. Obama’s final year in the White House is proving to be his busiest. Historically, rulemaking increases as presidents scramble to fulfill their regulatory agenda before leaving office.

There are already more than 2,000 proposed or final rules in the pipeline—including 144 that are expected to cost $100 million a year or more. These include yet more energy-efficiency mandates for home and commercial appliances, additional food-labeling requirements, stricter fuel economy standards for vehicles, and more stringent limits on consumer access to credit.

In a post-Obama era, the need for reform of the regulatory regime will be greater than ever before. Immediate reforms should include requiring legislation to undergo an impact analysis before a floor vote in Congress, as well as requiring that every major regulation obtain congressional approval before taking effect.

Sunset deadlines should also be imposed for all major rules, and independent agencies should be subject to the same White House regulatory review as executive branch agencies.

The unparalleled increase in regulatory burdens spells a decline in economic freedom and individual liberty, with a concomitant increase in political gamesmanship and cronyism—all of which inhibits innovation, investment and job creation, increases prices, and curtails consumer choice.

Congress needs to take immediate action to control the continued expansion of the administrative state, prevent further harm to the economy, and stem the erosion of individual liberty.